Battery Test on Cordless Power Tools Yields Surprising Results

Cordless Power ToolCordless power tools succeed or fail on their batteries, and right now battery technology has improved to the point where there’s virtually no need to use plug-in tools for most home improvement jobs. Entire houses can even be built without being tethered to a plug outlet or generator, but only if you choose the right equipment. That’s the challenge. These days there’s such a wide performance difference between visually similar cordless tools, it’s easy to buy new equipment that’s substantially inferior to leading edge technology. You have to be careful. Even tools that have the same voltage rating can perform very differently in the real world. That’s why I tested the loudest and most blatant cordless tool performance claim out there right now. It has to do with one particular kind of battery, and what I discovered during my tests indicate that improvements in battery technology continue to happen and accelerate.

The Claim

Milwaukee is one of a handful of international power tool manufacturers, and they claim to have developed a proprietary battery technology that beats everything else on the market in a big way. Figures like 40% longer run time between charges and 20% more power than the best competing batteries are being quoted, and this sounds like typical advertising hype to me because those gains are so huge. That’s why I put these numbers to a very rigorous, real-world test.

The Test

Milwaukee’s RedLithium batteries are the source of all the talk, and to test them I used an 18-volt impact wrench to drive 1/2-inch diameter by 6-inch long lag bolts into and out of predrilled holes in the side of a red oak test log as many times as possible on a full charge. I used the identical tool to test two batteries – one was Milwaukee’s regular 18-volt and the other a RedLithium 18-volt. To make the test most accurate, I ran each lag bolt in and out of a 3/8-inch diameter pilot hole only 10 times, before moving onto a new hole. More drives than this and the holes got too large to maintain consistent friction. Fresh holes mean tough driving, and that’s what I wanted. To measure claims for increased power, I also timed how long it took to drive each batch of test bolts from start to dead battery.

Funny Findings

One of the unexpected surprises of the test was just how hot the lag bolts became. After 15 or 20 drives into and out of the wood, the entire lag bolt was way too hot to touch. The oak log I used was still fresh enough to contain lots of sap, which boiled away vigorously around each bolt as it went into and out of the steaming wood. When the bolts got really hot it even caused audible puffs of steam to come out of the hole as the metal pulled away from the wood.

The Results

To ensure consistency I ran the test for each battery twice, after a full charge and recharge, and after the impact wrench itself cooled down. In the end I discovered that not all commercial claims gild the lily. In fact, Milwaukee had understated RedLithium performance substantially based on my lag bolt test results. Work completed on one charge was a whopping 73% greater for RedLithium, while driving each screw an average of 18% faster.

Nothing stays proprietary for very long these days, and while Milwaukee may have pretty good batteries right now, performance superiority is a moving target. In the end, tool users are the big winners, especially if you’ve take the time to figure out which technology is currently the best.

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Reddit

Posted on May 12th, 2011

Got a Question for Steve?